Energy Equation for Asphalt Shingles from FOWA Extraction Process
FOWA Extraction Process
This post discusses the energy equation for the FOWA process based on some observations and assumptions. Briefly, the process allows an asphalt producer to extract bunker fuel - test 1, bunker fuel - test 2 - S - 441 ppm and bunker fuel - test3 - S - 291 ppm [from asphalt1. The links to tests 2 and tests 3 show that the sulfur content in the extracted oil is between 291 - 441 ppm less than the 5000 ppm (or 0.5 %) as required by IMO as part of its Sulfur2020 initiative.
Fuel Oil From Waste Oil (FOWA) Process Energy Equation
We present the equation based on assumptions and observations2 about the extraction process in our prototype runs.
Assumptions
- 1 lb asphalt shingles – 20,000.00 BTU Mallick and Teto 2000
- 1 kwh consumes 3,412 BTU
- 1 gallon Bunker Fuel ~ 142, 886 BTU (aka No 4. Fuel Oil) Energy Conversion Toolbox
- 1 kwh costs approximately USD 00.10.
FOWA Assumptions (observations)
In our prototypes, we have recorded that 1 kg of asphalt shingles produces approximately 16 liters of bunker fuel. The rest of the arithmetic is based on converting them to fps units 3.
- 1 kg -> 16 liters of Bunker Fuel
- 1 lb -> 7.25 liters
- 1 lb -> 1.91 gallons
- 1 lb -> 1.91 * 142,886 = 272, 912 BTU
- Amount of diesel consumed : 100 ml ~ -3672 BTU
- 1 lb = 269,249 / 3412 kwH ~ 80 kwH
- 1 lb = 81 * 0.10 ~ USD 8.10 cents Energy produced.
The value added by our extraction process4 is approximately 13 times as shown below.
272, 912.00/20,000.00 ~ (approximately) 13.
These computations can serve as a guide for a waste producer to help modify their annual capacity while incorporating the fuel-oil extraction process.
Footnotes
-
The sulfur (sulphur) content in the oil extracted from FOWA varies from 391 ppm to 1806 ppm, which is less than the limit of 5000 ppm set by IMO as part of its Sulfur2020 campaign. ↩︎
-
For more information please follow ProducingULFO.md or Estimates for production of ULSFO ↩︎
-
The numbers are approximations. Please feel free to help us fix these numbers. ↩︎
-
Since we are dealing with square footage, or cubic feet, the savings by 13 times may not translate linearly; a thirteen times increase in BTU production might translate to three times increase in the overall waste processing pipeline. ↩︎